Posted March 16, 2019
BreOl72: Edit: in case you miss it: "With an increasing share paid to developers, our cut gets smaller."
Ancient-Red-Dragon: That quoted statement is sheer nonsense though, as what it actually means is extremely ambiguous & unclear. You seem to be implying that GOG no longer takes 30%. But GOG didn't actually that.
Granted, the statement you quoted could theoretically be misinterpreted to cause one think that they no longer take 30%; such potential confusion is perhaps the very reason why GOG worded it so cryptically.
I don't know, what about the words "with an increasing share paid to developers, our cut gets smaller" is ambiguous and unclear or cryptically and misinterpretable.
GOG's share was previously allegedly 30%, the devs' share was allegedly 70%.
Now the devs' share is over 70% ("with an increasing share paid to developers") and GOG's share is accordingly lower than the previous 30% ("our cut gets smaller")
And no matter what you might wish - GOG is not obliged to publicize, at what percentage exactly the profit is split - that's business internals, and therefore of no interest to any of us.