Posted May 30, 2011
Lone3wolf: Battle of Hastings
Same year as that, and a few weeks earlier, Harold had to march north 200 miles or so to battle invading Vikings - Harald Hardrada. Harold won that Battle of Stamford Bridge easily, but on the way back south, after hearing of the Normans (NOT French!! - well, at that time, anyway - more like more Vikings :P ) he couldn't really afford to pay his lords for more action, and they also needed to go tend and harvest their crops, so his forces at the hill that is now the town of Battle, in Hastings, was very much reduced.
The rest, as they say, is history
*dodges rotten tomatoes*
What really seemed to work against Harold was his army. The Normans used combined warfare with archers, cavalry, and ground forces. As I recall, the English forces consisted of only infantry. Combine that with the fact that they broke rank to chase down the fleeing Flemish forces only to be caught in a deadly counter-attack really didn't seem to favor them. Same year as that, and a few weeks earlier, Harold had to march north 200 miles or so to battle invading Vikings - Harald Hardrada. Harold won that Battle of Stamford Bridge easily, but on the way back south, after hearing of the Normans (NOT French!! - well, at that time, anyway - more like more Vikings :P ) he couldn't really afford to pay his lords for more action, and they also needed to go tend and harvest their crops, so his forces at the hill that is now the town of Battle, in Hastings, was very much reduced.
The rest, as they say, is history
*dodges rotten tomatoes*
Had Harold had disciplined troops in greater numbers, I'm sure their phalanx would have held.