If by "relevant" you mean "conclusive", then you are correct. As it stands, that doe not fit any definition of "relevant" that I am familiar with.

To answer a question the reply must be conclusive, otherwise it's supposition. It is irrelevant.

I disagree; perfect conclusiveness (i.e. the response tells you with 100% certainty that one version of the game is preferable) would be ideal, but some level of probative value of the supplied data is still responsive to the question and provides an idea as to how the consumer will react upon purchase.

Spoken like a lawyer. :)

Maybe it's the question at fault, at least in my eyes: if a question asks 'what's best?', you will get this kind of response from me. But if it asks 'what differences can I expect?', then my response would be entirely different: I tend to deal in absolutes with regard to queries.

Let's just agree to disagree and move on, eh?

I'm feeling tired, so I'll try to take that as a compliment and assume that no ad hominem was intended.

It was an observation, nothing more. Take that as you will.