LootHunter: Cut the bull! GOG haven't provided all the conditions for games to be published here (and yes, that includes many indie titles, not just AAA). And now you just accusing people, who simply want to play games, of not making a stance and not sacrificing their opportunity to play what they want for YOUR anti-DRM crusade.
Oh, and by the way, what about anti-censorship? Gaben at least claimed to support freedom of speech. Had GOG stuff done the same?
Uh you'll see I'm all about "no bull"...check the tagline ;)
My point earlier was that the issue is bigger than "GOG doesn't accept enough games" or even (now that you mention it) "GOG haven't provided all the conditions for games to be published here". In other words, even if GOG said "we're going to accept a lot more games and here are our standards" there are still many significant games (many non-indies and even some indies) who are loyal to Scheme or in big publishers' cases their own proprietary services. You're acting as though game publishers are afraid to submit their game here for fear it may get rejected, when the obvious reality is that they're afraid of DRM-free. Even when we see it would be the economically rational thing to put their game here, they have miscalculated that on their end and spin reasons not to do so.
Anti-censorship is a separate topic but since you brought it up, I'll say I am against censorship but am not going to support any DRM store. In this case I'd rather have an "inferior" censored DRM-free version because by my standards DRM-free makes it superior to a DRMed uncensored version.
