It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
timppu: Where do you draw the line, e.g. is a game released in 2017 old or new to you?
I don't know. I don't draw the line at all - for me only game quality matters. Doesn't matter if it was released a yar ago or twenty years. Just before Dark Souls Remastered I've beaten Moonwalker (sega, 1990) and before that I enjoied Far Cry 5 (PC, this year). And after Dark Souls I'm going to play Unreal Gold (PC, 1999). Or I can maybe finish one of Final Fantasy games.
Post edited July 28, 2018 by LootHunter
avatar
LootHunter: I finished Dark Souls Remastered yesterday. Is this game old or new? I mean, considering that Dark Souls was released in 2011 and Remastered is basically a patched version.
avatar
timppu: So how do you feel? Where do you draw the line, e.g. is a game released in 2017 old or new to you? After all, it was released over a year ago! A whole year!

I can't really define an exact year count for "old games". It is maybe more about the feel of the game(s), ie. do they feel (or look) like from a completely different gaming generation, than new games. At least when talking about AAA games, with indie games it is trickier as some of them pretend to be older than they are, with retro graphics and gameplay.

For that reason, I consider e.g. PS3 era games like Mirror's Edge, Spec Ops: The Line and maybe even Far Cry 2 still relatively new games. Their graphics look "fresh enough" and newer games have generally a similar feeling to them. And yeah, I consider also Dark Souls to be a new game.

PS2 era games (also on PC) I already consider old games.
Personally, when it comes to console games, I consider Nintendo 64 games (and games for other consoles released around that time) to be modern, as there were huge changes in the style of games (notably the use of 3D) around that time. A game has to be SNES-era or older for me to count it as an old or classic game.

As for PC games, I note that I consider the original Baldur's gate to be modern; only games older than that can qualify as old or classic in my mind.

So, I draw the line much earlier than you do.

avatar
MartiusR: So while I technically still buy "new" games, I feel that it's rather an extention of my focus on "older" games rather than genuine interest in "modern" games. Needles to say, when my brother last time (in this month) asked about some "recently popular" games, I was confused, since I wasn't sure what were recent "noticeable" releases of AAA games.
That is, perhaps, how I feel. Games like Hollow Knight and Mary Skelter may be recent, but they play like old games, though perhaps with some modern mechanics thrown in.
Post edited July 28, 2018 by dtgreene
I draw my line at ps3. Anything on ps2 and before, I consider as old. I think there is a big difference between their graphic capabilities and gameplay polish that makes ps2 era games feels a lot closer to me to its older brothers from previous era, than to ps3 games where conventions of gameplay are pretty well defined already, if that makes sense

And yes, I prefer games that I consider as old. I have no problem when I played Ultima 7 for first time a few days ago (with the help of exult for screen scroll smoothing of course) yet a game such as spec ops the line failed to hold my interest.
I find myself going back to old (19xx) games every now and then, not only because they are my childhood memories but also because they are still good in terms of game mechanics, but the graphics and interface is so clumsy compared to what one gets nowadays that I usually do not stay very long. But I always come back.Some of them are like a good book or movie - they don't age and I want to redo them multiple times again.