Posted April 17, 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61f89/61f8997dc988061561d249e8666543a03b2a8599" alt="avatar"
That one video discussing this Scarlettgate made a good point that there really doesn't seem to be much of any big Hollywood female stars of Asian, let alone Japanse, heritage. There was Lucy Liu, but she is not Japanese (I was actually a bit annoyed by her playing a Japanese character in Kill Bill 2). If it is deemed enough "as long as she is Asian", then they can cast some Indian actress into the role, right?
And frankly I never liked Lucy as an actor that much, I have hard time believing Ghost in the Shell would be a better movie with something like her in it, instead of e.g. Scarlett. Isn't Lucy Liu like 70 years old by now already?
Now I am reminded of that Asian chick in "Scott Pilgrim vs. the World", Ellen Wong. But then casting a minor "star" like her into a leading role is a big financial risk to the investors, and she has no Japanese heritage either I think (judging by her name mostly).
The investors have to think which brings more viewers to the cinema: a well-known and widely liked actress like Scarlett (instead of e.g. Ellen Who?), or the name "Ghost in the Shell". Somehow I feel a renowned actress is a safer bet.
When I watch movies I don't recognize on the TV, quite often the decision is based on whether it has any famous actors in it. If not, I more easily dismiss it as some cheap TV movie and look for something else instead. I know, sometimes you have to take a risk, e.g. recently I saw <span class="bold">Chronicle</span> even though at first it didn't seem too interesting, and no known actors either to make me watch it. I'm glad I did, it gave a whole new angle to all those superhero movies.
Post edited April 17, 2016 by timppu