It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQVjy5UgHh0

So apparently America needs more soppy feel-good propaganda about SPACE, and because those bankers need their billion dollar bailouts they can't afford to actually put an astronaut on Mars in reality, so they'll just do in in their imaginations.

Please Mr Scott, just give up and retire, you have well and truly lost it.
There, there. Take your pills and have a strong cup of coffee. You'll feel better then.
You seem to be a bit confused.



Besides, every trailer for the movie should come with SPOILER ALERT tag.
avatar
jamyskis: There, there. Take your pills and have a strong cup of coffee. You'll feel better then.
Are you sure one should mix meds with caffeine? The side effects might be worse.
low rated
avatar
InkPanther: You seem to be a bit confused.
Not really, it's just telling that at the same time the US guts spending on NASA that they are putting out soppy movies like this and Interstellar about America going into space.
avatar
InkPanther: You seem to be a bit confused.
avatar
Crosmando: Not really, it's just telling that at the same time the US guts spending on NASA that they are putting out soppy movies like this and Interstellar about America going into space.
Isn't it enough that we went to the Moon?

Besides the budget for this movie is small potatoes compared to the budget and production of even preparing and testing for the Moon Landing :P
avatar
InkPanther: You seem to be a bit confused.
avatar
Crosmando: Not really, it's just telling that at the same time the US guts spending on NASA that they are putting out soppy movies like this and Interstellar about America going into space.
Obviously. NASA gets less funding, they make movies about people going into space so the next generation will want to go into space again, thus asking for increased funding on the space industry, national or private. It does make sense.
avatar
Crosmando: Not really, it's just telling that at the same time the US guts spending on NASA that they are putting out soppy movies like this and Interstellar about America going into space.
avatar
JMich: Obviously. NASA gets less funding, they make movies about people going into space so the next generation will want to go into space again, thus asking for increased funding on the space industry, national or private. It does make sense.
Also China is planing on going to the Moon so why is he reliant on NASA?

I mean the Soviets publically showed to the world what the space looked outside of earth during Yuri Gagarin's flight.
avatar
Crosmando: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQVjy5UgHh0

So apparently America needs more soppy feel-good propaganda about SPACE, and because those bankers need their billion dollar bailouts they can't afford to actually put an astronaut on Mars in reality, so they'll just do in in their imaginations.

Please Mr Scott, just give up and retire, you have well and truly lost it.
Fun Fact: I have no intention to see this movie, at least not in cinema, since the last three movies by Scott I went to see were downright terrible and I don't like Matt Damon much,, but I didn't start a new thread about "teh terribul americanz making movie I don't want to see !1!!1oneone". So how about you chill out and go watch a movie you like or something instead of trolling about things you didn't even watch?
avatar
Elmofongo: Isn't it enough that we went to the Moon?
No, not really. Personally I used to really believe I'll get to see men land on Mars. And beyond that... who knows? I still hope for it, but it looks less real then ever. But I still hope. For Commander Sinclair. And Marilyn Monroe.
Post edited October 09, 2015 by Breja
The movie is already out and Its based on a fantastic novel by Andy Weir and consequently is an amazing movie that everyone should go out and see in the theater if they can. At its core the story is about one man's refusal to give up no matter how dire the situation by trying to solve every problem with science (bitch!) that he comes across.

Matt Damon has to carry the majority of the film on his own and he does a superb job to keep the audience invested in his quest for survival. There is a lot of humor as well which you don't expect from these kind of movies since sci-fi like Interstellar for example though quite good, was a much dour affair in comparison. In short its definitely the best movie I have seen so far this year.
Post edited October 09, 2015 by stg83
low rated
avatar
Crosmando: Not really, it's just telling that at the same time the US guts spending on NASA that they are putting out soppy movies like this and Interstellar about America going into space.
avatar
JMich: Obviously. NASA gets less funding, they make movies about people going into space so the next generation will want to go into space again, thus asking for increased funding on the space industry, national or private. It does make sense.
So you admit that it's propaganda then?

To me it seems like a declining nation getting teary-eyed and thinking about the "good old days" when they put a man on the moon.
avatar
Elmofongo: I mean the Soviets publically showed to the world what the space looked outside of earth during Yuri Gagarin's flight.
This is actually what gives Americans a giant pain in the bum to this day, the fact that a Russian (and a commie to boot) got into space first. That will be in the history books forever.
Post edited October 09, 2015 by Crosmando
avatar
Crosmando: So you admit that it's propaganda then?
Not unless the budget cutbacks were made before 2011, when the book came out.

Also, to address your comment about not being able to afford to put a man on mars, putting someone there is easy. Getting him back is the hard part.
avatar
JMich: Obviously. NASA gets less funding, they make movies about people going into space so the next generation will want to go into space again, thus asking for increased funding on the space industry, national or private. It does make sense.
avatar
Crosmando: So you admit that it's propaganda then?

To me it seems like a declining nation getting teary-eyed and thinking about the "good old days" when they put a man on the moon.
avatar
Elmofongo: I mean the Soviets publically showed to the world what the space looked outside of earth during Yuri Gagarin's flight.
avatar
Crosmando: This is actually what gives Americans a giant pain in the bum to this day, the fact that a Russian (and a commie to boot) got into space first. That will be in the history books forever.
That and the Americans (and UK) not being the first to reach Berlin and kicking Hitler's ass :P
avatar
JMich: Obviously. NASA gets less funding, they make movies about people going into space so the next generation will want to go into space again, thus asking for increased funding on the space industry, national or private. It does make sense.
avatar
Crosmando: So you admit that it's propaganda then?
Nope, it would be propaganda if the movie was done by a government to popularize the idea of space travel.

When it's done by someone who wants to popularise space travel so that his government will do it, it's more like lobbying ;)

Why wouldn't an american dream about going to Mars, even if his country has more or less given up?
avatar
Elmofongo: Also China is planing on going to the Moon so why is he reliant on NASA?
Not sure how it is in the movie but China's space program plays its role in the book.