This thread really is drawing out /showing up some nutters now. O____o~

You mean the same "nutters" who theorized/said the coof likely came from Wuhan & got laughed at for doing so, only to be proven likely(if not certainly) right recently**? Those same "nutters"?

(**on that and a number of things related to the coof)

just the nutters.

Yet you failed to prove any of it wrong.

As much as i hate bullying, this is why it started...

The bigger problem with covid is that the wide array of tissues it affects and the incubation period (despite what the CDC says it is) results in huge risks for permanent symptoms. I know people whom have permanently lost their sense of smell.

This doesn't appear to be the case with SARS-CoV-2. This is the first time i've heard of this, so i don't know the exact mechanism, but my suspicion is with cases like HIV, where the antibodies just aren't effective at all, which does not appear to be the case with covid at all, despite the presense of some components of HIV. The new mRNA technology also makes this less likely to happen, as well compared to old vaccine technology, as far as I can tell.

The usual excuse is, "i already pay taxes for that." Though, there've been some intersting studies saying otherwise, too. I'm sure you believe the fine people hoax, too. Or more than likely you don't care, 'cause I already have a rough idea who you are. Just change your account again, and i'll find you again, no problem.

Ah, the good ol' Argumentum ad Ignorantiam**.....a classic.
(**argument from ignorance)

You're the one who claimed it wasn't true, it's your burden of proof to support your claim.

Well you're in here with everyone else, so: either yer a "nutter" yerself, or you like the company of such.....so which is it? :)

-

The onus/burden of proof lies on the one who made the initial claims, which was yourself....so get to it then.

No, the burden is on the person who is making the current claim. You claimed it wasn't true without a shred of argument, the burden is on you to actually provide an argument. Then you mischaracterized ad ignorantiam to justify your way of shifting the burden of proof.

No one is saying I'm right because you cannot prove me wrong, what is being said is you need to provide an actual argument.

I mean, let's point out how absurd this "logic" is.

"You owe me $100"
"No I don't"
"Here is a receipt saying otherwise"
"No it isn't"
"This is clearly a receipt, the burden is on you to prove your claim it isn't a receipt"
"No, the burden is on you to prove your initial claim"

Or of course, there's this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ

negation isn't an argument

Enjoy it while you still can. 5-6 hours left until GOG office opens up.

"semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit"
("the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges")

The burden of proof always lies with the one who made the initial claim(s), not the one denying/disputing said claims.

So then go ahead, please prove all of what you said earlier in post 103......i'll wait.

(As for your example and your claims in this thread[Post 103]: you're the one essentially saying someone owes you $100, and then failing to provide "receipts" when they deny/dispute it)

i like them to out themselves by replying to me for no reason other than to attempt to entrap me in their little games.

Hello pot, my name is kettle

then shut the flying fuggup!

You don't need to reply back to every post I make....if my posts bother you, simply hide/ignore them.....I promise I won't be offended.

(generic quoted so as to avoid giving the above user a reply notification to bother them)

=-=-=-=

Back on-topic for a bit

I hope these lockdowns/etc end asap, as there are so many things I put off doing that I can't do atm.....things i'm kicking myself for like travelling out of state on trips and etc. Here's hoping stuff opens back up soon.