Posted September 02, 2022
Time4Tea: I addressed all of your points, but it seems we have a fundamental difference of opinion. I respect that Jordan communicates openly and speaks his mind, at the risk of possibly upsetting some people. It seems that you don't - you are upset because he's said some things that you don't like. I personally love Zoom's open communication and would hate to see Jordan become silent and reticent (the way GOG's execs are), through fear that he might offend someone. I truly hope he doesn't change.
Again, it seems to come down to a difference of opinion and I'm not sure what more there is to say beyond that. I'm fine with accepting you have a different opinion to me, but is the opposite true for you? From your last couple of posts, it seems maybe not ... ?
RoboPond: How have you addressed all my points? Again, it seems to come down to a difference of opinion and I'm not sure what more there is to say beyond that. I'm fine with accepting you have a different opinion to me, but is the opposite true for you? From your last couple of posts, it seems maybe not ... ?
You've said that Jordan speaks openly and his mind.
I've said i'm not even talking about him at the moment, i've not seen him post much.
What I am talking about is you and other Zoom members openly posting negative things about another company in public and then allowing singling out GOG members by usernames on a platform or a channel that most will not know about.
How are you not seeing that its wrong? How are you not seeing the double standard that its fine for you do make comments about GOG there but when the same comments get made about Zoom here you call it bad?
Edit: Altered:
and then allowing singling out GOG members by usernames on a platform or a channel that most will not know about.
Post edited September 02, 2022 by Syphon72