I actually believe this claim. Basically because its about the only thing I would have believed. However, survivors, ESPECILLY one with one shot kill abilities are generally anti-town. I cant see how we allow Baron to survive since we...
A - Have no idea how many mafia there are.
B - Making the assumption he is telling the truth.
The crux of the problem is there is nothing holding him to town. He says he wishes to play on our side but that doesnt make it so, he wins with anyone. We currently have 11, if we assume a standard game of 3 mafia (which, who knows, see problem 1) and we dont lynch Baron and mslynch someone else, along with the night kill that puts us at 5 vs 3 vs 1. He simply needs to whack one town and they are in reach of an easy win. Now, thats just one scenario, we can always make a correct lynch, but that really just pushes out the problem another day.
And for fairness sake, this could go towns way as well. For example, we choose to bypass the lynch on Baron and lynch one mafia correct today. That would allow us another day to consider at least keeping Baron around and making it more palpable to him to kill a mafia, ending the game that much quicker.
Bottom line, there is no trusting a survivor, especially one with a last minute "I win" button. So, I am content with lynching a third party player today instead of later but sooner or later lynch him we must in my opinion. Again, unless someone has a dead ringer mafia target for D2 lynch. And yes, I understand you all might think thats me, but then why would I suggest this? I also understand that this plays into the idea that Baron and I are in cahoots, and while I would love to be remembered as possibly the greatest mafia play of all time, that isnt the case as I am neither scum or scheming with Baron. Hence the reason my vote remains.
I would like to hear what some others have to say about this before the hammer though and would request it holds off until we have discussed a bit.