It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)Is RAGE on PC betrer now?(57 posts)(57 posts)
(57 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
This is my favourite topic
Posted February 04, 2013
....borderlands is a damn sight more colourful :P
Posted February 04, 2013
It is more of a tech demo for the engine, than actually a game.
Posted February 04, 2013
No-one has any ideas about my friend's complete lack of textures then? We've tried different drivers, custom rageconfig.cfg, changing settings, launch options. Not sure what else we can try.
Posted February 04, 2013
I've put 42 hours into this game so far and I can honestly say I've enjoyed the hell out of it. Sure it had launch issues, but who cares, since they eventually fixed them and the engine runs smooth as butter now.

Still have to get the Scorchers DLC.. but yeah this game is seriously underrated. I want to see a sequel.
Posted February 04, 2013
avatar
Neobr10: Nice try, but you fail at logics. I'm not talking about something as subjective as taste, so your analogy doesn't quite work to prove my point wrong. I said that there was the texture pop-in issue when the game was release. This is a fact, this can be objectively observed.
But see it's not, because I didn't have pop-in issues.

*shrug*
Posted February 09, 2013
Toolkit released on Steam today

http://www.bethblog.com/2013/02/08/rage-tool-kit-available-today-on-steam/
Posted February 09, 2013
avatar
AzureKite: It is more of a tech demo for the engine, than actually a game.
Most of id's games were tech demos. The better ones were made by Raven ;)

*puts on asbestos undies*
Posted February 09, 2013
avatar
Roman5: Toolkit released on Steam today

http://www.bethblog.com/2013/02/08/rage-tool-kit-available-today-on-steam/
35+ GB
Posted February 09, 2013
The main game got an update last night, too. It now has a 64-bit executable (with mod support), but the launcher does say that it is unsupported, and I daresay that the 32-bit save games are incompatible with the 64-bit version.

I wonder if the 64-bit version is an improvement if it can make use of more memory? Anyone tried it?
Posted February 12, 2013
avatar
korell: On the subject of Rage, a Steam friend of mine is trying to get it working on their machine but suffering major texture problems. This isn't the popping-in issue, the textures just aren't loading up at all. Screenshots attached.

I believe they have a Quad Core Phenom 1 and an ATI 5870. They are running on 32-bit XP.
They don't yet have the Scorchers DLC (which has the latest 1.3 patch in it) but they might get it to see if it fixes it.

So, seeing those screenshots, I've not seen anything like that with Rage before. I know about poor quality texture problems, corrupted texture problems, and pop-in texture issues, but completely missing ones is a new one to me and I can't find other examples of it. Anyone got any ideas?
Well, I managed to help my friend get the textures loading. Just in case this helps anyone, the setting we used in the rageconfig.cfg file was to change vt_maxppf to 1. At present he is still using 4k textures, but we might try more tweaks to get him up to 8k if possible.
Posted February 12, 2013
EDIT: I just wrote a response to a 4 day old argument, thinking it was current. Rather than restart said argument, I've deleted the content of my post.
Post edited February 12, 2013 by pi4t
Posted February 12, 2013
Quick question - those mega-textures look nice from a distance, but are they supposed to be so grainy up close?
Pages:
1
2
3
4
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)Is RAGE on PC betrer now?(57 posts)(57 posts)
(57 posts)