Madbrain: I don't know what kind of PC you have Arteveld, but it is possible for DosBoxed Blood to be blazingly fast even on older machines like 1GHz+ Still, whoever wants to get a full performance on XP and without DosBox head over to http deathmask net and go to Build XP section. You can find a sweet tutorial for running Blood natively on XP. Tested and working. I'm buying GOG version anyway, because I don't like to tinker around the way I used to.
An Athlon x2 4400, 2.2ghz, with 3gigs of 4-4-4-12@800 ram, and a msi 7600gt with 256mb, but that doesn't matter much.
You must know, i was not reffering to the standard resolution Blood. I was thinking about the VESA resolutions, 800x600 will be just fine.;)
I know a thing or two about DOS, been on that for 10 years or so, and i don't feel like an alien with DOSBox. And i assure You, my rig does a bad job with Blood, at 800x600. ;)
I actually did check out that site some time ago, when i was still on XP [i'm on Win7x64 now], and it didn't work for me. That one might depend on the graphic card though, NVidia's legacy support is nonexistant. I also checked out VMs, VirtualBox and VMWare Player, and they still aren't good solutions for gaming.;)
The reason for me nabbing for that sourcecode is eDuke32, and the wonders of it's side projects. i wish we could experience Blood in such a way. :>
Ooh, and the reason for updating my rig the last time, in 2006, was to play Crusader on DOSBox. Back then it was a single core Athlon 3500+ [2.2ghz] with an ATI X800GTO. And that rig was great for Crusader. ;>