anaheim85: Hey folks,
as the title states I´d like to hear your opinion about both these games. Reviews are kinda bad but I have found great pleasures in games like Cryostasis which had also gotten not so good scores. Have some of you played these games? What´s good, what´s bad? I played almost all RPGs of the last 15 years, so I don´t bother if there not polished to AAA standards.
Thanks in advance!
I have not played Game of Thrones yet but I do own it from a sale and after playing about halfway through "Of Orcs and Men" which uses the same combat system, I am looking forward to it. I've read it has a very good story too.
Particularly in the case of lukewarm reviews I just try to get as much objective info out of them as I can and use that to make my own call about whether or not I think I will like them. For example, after reading about "Of Orcs and Men" it sounded like something I would like and I was surprised the reviews were not more favorable. It did tend to score on the low end of "good" but being about 20 hours into it I'd be more inclined to call it great myself, say an 8.0 out of 10. I think Gamespot gave it a 7.0 and users there gave it a 6.8 on average I think which is the high side of "fair." To me, the game is really underrated. It looks great, the sound and music is good, the story is good and the combat is fun although I'd highly recommend a gamepad for best controls.
By the way, I plan to play "Game of Thrones" with a gamepad as well given the combat is the same and so probably the controls are the same. "Of Orcs and Men" just feels very natural with a gamepad and is fun to play in my opinion. If you like ARPGs you might want to read up on this game too and see if you think it is for you.
If "Game of Thrones" does have the good quality story I've heard about along with the gameplay/combat system I already like, that will carry it past any other imperfections most likely for me personally.