Geralt_of_Rivia: Do you want some cheese with your whine?
The rules for the giveaway have been posted. They require at least one month of somewhat recent forum participation. The oldest of your messages (at least of the ones you linked) is 10 days old. Hence you don't qualify.
BranjoHello: If you were discriminated for no good reason, would you stay quiet?
To be honest, no I wouldn't.
But I don't see any discrimination here. You were measured against the same rules as everyone else.
BranjoHello: I'm active on this forums almost on daily basis since September 2013, I follow the discussions and if I don't post in some thread that means I didn't have anything to add, not that I've didn't see what's going on. There is a bunch of people from here that I interact with either through PM or Steam chat, I'm no newbie.
I usually write very little because when I think I don't have anything worthwhile, interesting, or at least funny to add to a discussion I'd rather not write anything at all. But I still never had any problems with the participation rule for this giveaway. So it's hard for me to imagine that someone
who is active almost daily can't participate.
I admit that I know the forum search sucks quite a lot so I didn't use it to look for your messages. But if you really participate that much how come you could not show any message older than 10 days? By clicking on "Show more" in "Topics I've participated in" again and again you can get a very long list of your old posts. It would have been very easy for you to show messages that go back long enough to qualify you. Yet, you only showed messages that don't qualify you. We can only guess what that means...
BranjoHello: This whole thing started with me saying that luck won't help you if Sachys "disapproves of you", and now it's clear that I was right.
How come you are the only one who thinks you have been treated wrongly? If you could show Sachys or Foxworks proper forum participation per PM I'm sure they would say: "Sorry, I couldn't find that with the search. You can be in next time.". Instead of doing so you keep whining.
Keep living in your own dreamworld if you wish. I refuse to be part of it.
BranjoHello: Sachys did mention some
shitlist of his, so maybe it would be good if he post it on his giveaways, that way people would know if they have a chance or not. Lack or transparency led to this situation.
More transparency can never hurt. But most people here (including me!) trust them enough to not manipulate drawings.
And lack of transparency did not lead to you accusing them of foul play. Your lack of decency did. If you think a procedure lacks transparency you
ask for it instead of outright claiming fraudulent behaviour.
And if you can't understand that than any further word is wasted on you anyway.