kais246: I really liked them all (Except underworld, like with everything, try to accomedate consoles and quality falls).
Aliasalpha: Err... like how EVERY Tomb Raider game in the series has come out on console, sometimes multiple consoles? How exactly did underword fail in comparison to Legend or Anniversary? Personally I think it felt better, slower paced and deliberate and Lara moved a lot more like a person who had intertia which I thought improved it. Then again I'm a bit weird, I like GTA4 for the same reasons that most people seem to hate it
kais246: I think a pettion for getting them on GoG is required.
Definitely (as long as its addressed to square enix/eidos), I really want to play angel of darkness and I'd just as soon only pay $6 to do it.
I found it to much of a stray from older Tomb raiders. I didnt play it patched but i found that being able to pick whatever guns you wanted at the start of a level and then being able to change was really off putting for me. The control scheme was strange and in my opinion the entire game seemed like it was doumbed down for younger people and those who like to tap A to win so to speak. Keep in mind i played the PC version.
Plus in one of the interviews, one of the develpers said "Now that thanks to the power of nextgeneration consoles we can do stuff we never were able to do before" (Or something to that power). That ALWAYS puts a sour taste in my mouth. ANOTHER thing, as far as i know the DLC for for Underworld is only going to be on 360. Sounds like Microsoft is getting its greasy hand in on the franchise (Even more so?) to me.
/Rant
I wouldent mind AoD being on GoG at all, since it didnt do so well they should have MUCH truble getting it on here. All the Edios TR games, being that there old and not being distrubuted much anymore, shouldent be to hard either. Depends who owns them now.