orcishgamer: So assuming you haven't had your head obstinately stuck in the sand you know what it is and know why I said, touch screen works for some games. Hell, my joystick, while great for MW4, pretty much blows for Quake 4, and vice versa.
KingofGnG: No, touch screen works for stuff I won't consider worth of being defined "gaming" anytime soon.
It's funny, because I consider Angry Birds to be Castles on steroids. Seriously, if the Castles developers could have run the complex physics calculations they run in Angry Birds, they would have.
I don't know when you started gaming, but for me it was arcades and the C64, some on the Apple IIe. When I look at some of the old games I used to play (you can pick them up on compilation "classics" discs to this day) that was indeed some simple stuff, at times.
Now, if you want to be snobbish and say most of the stuff on phones is lightweight and casual, sure I'd agree with you. I do think you're wrong about dismissing the entire platform, though. That doesn't mean you have to ever play a single game on a phone, but the fact remains that there are some pretty deep games released on phones as well. As with anything with such a low barrier to entry, there is likely to be a much higher proportion of crap, as well.