Santiago: Actually the Grandmaster was wrong. His stance was, that you couldn't save the world without killing all those people he thought expendable. What Ciri did, proved that you indeed could get the job done without doing all that crazy shit the Grandmaster deemed inevitable. So...
And no, this wasn't the whole point of the first game, especially not for Geralt, who never really cared about all that stuff. :D For Geralt the first game was about stopping Salamandra and getting the witcher secrets back.
It's a theme of all the Witcher stories, that he stumbles into things that are too big for him, or at least that there's more going on than he's aware of or cares about.
Well, I never meant to say that Grandmastah was right for doing the things he did, but what was explaind as a "vision of a madman" (something crazy person invented in his head and thus is false) turned out to be true. It still leaves Geralt in the right for stopping him, his way was wrong, but I meant that white frost vas not something crazy peroson came up with, it's was a serious problem for the universe. And at the end of the W3 geralt should be kinda shaken by that realization since untill that point he thought it to be nothing more than madmans ravings.
And W1 is multilayered game, but it's climax was stopping Grandmastah who was behind the Salamandra the whole time. It was not only thing in that the first game is about, yes. And it was revealed pretty late,yes. But in the end it was given the most important parts of the game's story.
And I kinda liked story in W2 a lot since it was all about political intrigue, while third one had a little of that, while falling for the usual one where you save the world. But I guess one could argue that W3 is about finding Ciri and helping her, while her story is about saving universe and thus game's story is not about saving universe but it's related to someone who does that :)