It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
MarkoH01: Simply not true and no modification needed. Just go to "Library" and tick the checkbox "Default to classic download links without Galaxy included in game..." - untick the "Show downloader links instead of ordinary links on game card" as well.
I found out about this just right now myself. My check-box is just behind the "Latest updated"-writing, which is why I understood this to be that the latest thing updated were the downloader links.
As it turns out unchecking it switches from the GOG-Downloader to the classic installer.

Just in case I don't have to stalk you back. I wrote the post in adalias' thread before you answered in this one. ;)
Post edited January 04, 2018 by aufisch
avatar
MarkoH01: Simply not true and no modification needed. Just go to "Library" and tick the checkbox "Default to classic download links without Galaxy included in game..." - untick the "Show downloader links instead of ordinary links on game card" as well.
avatar
aufisch: I found out about this just right now myself. My check-box is just behind the "Latest updated"-writing, which is why I understood this to be that the latest thing updated were the downloader links.
As it turns out unchecking it switches from the GOG-Downloader to the classic installer.
Nice to hear that (not the checkbox thing but that it is working for you now). Don't forget to checkout these cool Legacy boxart option for the library and the manual sort and and and ... best script ever - together with Barefoot Essentials :)
Post edited January 04, 2018 by MarkoH01
avatar
aufisch: Adalias Fundamentals seem to cover the Downloader only, not the classical installers. If this is not correct, I would gladly use that script.
I'm not familiar with either of those scripts, I've only heard about them. I feel similarly about unvetted software, but those two members who write those scripts definitely seem to have been around a while and trusted by many here.

Still, I'm not keen on expecting computer programmers in general to do anything for me, it usually doesn't happen. However, I think those two have been quite responsive and generally friendly to others, from what I've read in their threads for their software on this forum.

Anyway, I took a quick look at the webpage for the purchased game library. Showing a different set of installers for a game looks tricky. However, if it was done for the Downloader links, then it might be doable for the Classic Installers. It's definitely different because access to the Downloader links is just a link to another page, whereas the Galaxy and Classic Installers are not on the library page both at the same time. They get swapped deleted and inserted as each option of either Galaxy or Classic is chosen. I think that means they would have to write new code to handle that, when they have time.

Personally, I just organize my library myself, but without any programming.

I pick out from my library a game that matters to me in the moment and then add its information to an HTML file. HTML is just plain text, and I don't bother with any JavaScript or CSS for it. It's just a file with ".html" as its extension.

I keep it as a simple list with links to the installer files I downloaded and a link to the GOG game page. I've also tried adding a link to the installer online at the GOG's website, but those are flakey because they can get changed when there's an update. Though, that is an easy way to check whether there's an update without traversing the GOG website every time. (I'm not sure how reliable that is…)

No need for a webserver, I just open the basic HTML file in any browser and it just works. Instead of "http://" it will show "file:///" beginning the address, but no need to type that because that happens automatically. I keep the HTML file in the same directory as the files I downloaded, which is also the same directory as where I install the games. But it doesn't have to be that way. I do it that way because it's just really easy to paste the name of the file into an HTML link without needing the whole path on my hard drive. For example, here are a couple games that likely don't exist:
<p>Name of a Game: <a href="name-of-a-game-installer.dmg">name-of-a-game-installer.dmg</a>
<p>Another Game: <a href="another-game-installer.dmg">another-game-installer.dmg</a>
Nothing more than that is needed really. That's plenty of HTML. HTML pages out on the World Wide Web are unnecessarily complicated and bloated.

However, I like to put everything in a list and have headers, like <h2>.
<ul>
<li>
<h2>Name of a Game</h2>
<a href="name-of-a-game-installer.dmg">name-of-a-game-installer.dmg</a>
<li>
<h2>Another Game</h2>
<a href="another-game-installer.dmg">another-game-installer.dmg</a>
</ul>
It's possible to open a directory by simply linking to the name of the directory instead of a file. I've noticed Firefox will list the directory contents itself, however Safari sends the request to the Finder to show the directory.

Personally, I use emacs to edit my files so I've also been using Emacs Web Wowser to view my own HTML files. As such, I modified its function `eww-follow-link' to allow opening installers or linked applications. In general web browsers don't usually allow that, something to do with security reasons or whatever. Anyway, instead of just opening the directory I now can begin an installation from the HTML file or even launch the games. (I don't like cluttering my computer with shortcuts, and I don't like searching everywhere.)

In this way I can just edit the basic HTML file and organize my games myself based on whatever criteria I think of, and type that right away without waiting for anyone else. I can type whatever information I want, link to other HTML files with my notes for a game, and so on. Or leave out whatever. Navigation is a lot smoother for me than using the Finder (macos) or Windows Explorer, because it's only the files I want to see and with my notes all in one place. And basic HTML is cross-platform compatible across all operating systems, backwards compatible with all web browsers, and future compatible.

I haven't done my whole library because that's already online. I just add what seems interesting, perhaps something I plan on playing sometime soon (hopefully), so I'm not overwhelmed by it all. Later, there's no need to visit the GOG website if I've already downloaded the installer. I just click to install, or click to play, or review my notes first.

Of course, making different lists ordered by genre or ordered by release date would be as simple as copy/paste from one file into a new file. It can be just the ones already decided upon, leaving out the rest for later. Or it could be as simple as just the names of the games as links, each leading to the information at the exact paragraph within the other file.

Maybe that sounds too different… It's not really any work, but it's also not all at once. So, it's likely not of interest. :-/
avatar
thomq: Friendly meant advice that is just too complicated for me to read it until the end but still is very much appreciated...
Maybe you should really give these scripts a chance.
avatar
thomq: Friendly meant advice that is just too complicated for me to read it until the end but still is very much appreciated...
avatar
MarkoH01: Maybe you should really give these scripts a chance.
Not advice really, I always try to avoid that. Just sharing personal experience. :-)

It's good to know the scripts will do the sorting and option for different links. That got figured out and posted by everyone else while I was writing. ^_^
Post edited January 04, 2018 by thomq
I see only one option.
Post edited January 04, 2018 by tinyE
avatar
MarkoH01: Nice to hear that (not the checkbox thing but that it is working for you now). Don't forget to checkout these cool Legacy boxart option for the library and the manual sort and and and ... best script ever - together with Barefoot Essentials :)
I already got Barefoot Essentials I am just checking it out right now. :)

Yeah, the positioning of this checkbox was really confusing for me (see picture)

...and in case you didn't read my edit above.

avatar
aufisch: Just in case I don't have to stalk you back. I wrote the post in adalias' thread before you answered in this one. ;)
[br]
avatar
thomq: It's good to know the scripts will do the sorting and option for different links. That got figured out and posted by everyone else while I was writing. ^_^
Hi thomq. To be honest your post was even harder to understand than getting this script to run and understanding how it works. :)

But thank you for your effort anyway.
Attachments:
Post edited January 04, 2018 by aufisch
avatar
aufisch: Yeah, the positioning of this checkbox was really confusing for me (see picture)
Unfortunately something seems to be wrong with your attachement (try using jpg instead of bmp it's usually much smaller anyway).
avatar
john_hatcher: Thanks for you explanation, but as said before, this is GOGs job! I simple will not use this script, because, as you said, I hate addons. I currently only use one addon (uMatrix) in Vivaldi and another one I enable when I need it. Until I don't see a good reason why I have to have more, I won't activate more. Sorry.
no need to be sorry! I totally understand the position, aside from an adblocker, adaliafundamentals is the only script I have installed

I totally agree GOG should make a LOT about their site better, and the library functionality would be my top priority/desire for them to get done too (I want to be able to have more than 5 fucking games on 1 shelf, what kind of shelf is that? and full functionality of just putting anything where I want WITH EASE, like shuffling around a library of media SHOULD BE)

it should offer easier and better options than a physical-world set of shelves with stuff on it, but it's not, and it's utterly ridiculously bad, so bad in fact, I went ahead and installed a script! and I'm glad I have!!! it's such a huge relief, it's worth it, and there is NO bulkyness to it, it's a good safe tiny non-intrusive script, and I'm very glad for that (:

GOG has shown nothing but utter lack of competence in regard to this, it's no excuse and there's no reason they don't adopt some of what adalia has done other than they don't care + extreme incompetence, so, I'm with you on that front
avatar
MarkoH01: Unfortunately something seems to be wrong with your attachement (try using jpg instead of bmp it's usually much smaller anyway).
Weird that, the only file-format it allowed me was bmp? Trying again, nope, I always get wrong file-format if I try uploading as jpg or png.

Trying imgur:
https://imgur.com/a/ywtqr
avatar
MarkoH01: Unfortunately something seems to be wrong with your attachement (try using jpg instead of bmp it's usually much smaller anyway).
avatar
aufisch: Weird that, the only file-format it allowed me was bmp? Trying again, nope, I always get wrong file-format if I try uploading as jpg or png.

Trying imgur:
https://imgur.com/a/ywtqr
Funny, looks different for me (see attachment) and as you can see jpg is working fine as well for me. Maybe because of the new Firefox? (It's recent update disabled several scripts so I decided to stay on the old 56.0.2 vrelease).
Attachments:
gogtest.jpg (267 Kb)
Post edited January 05, 2018 by MarkoH01
Good luck, I'm still waiting for them to fix a bug I posted 18 months ago about game tiles not showing up in the Galaxy app. Eventually I just got rid of the app because it looked stupid with blank grey tiles next to half my games.
avatar
MarkoH01: Funny, looks different for me (see attachment) and as you can see jpg is working fine as well for me. Maybe because of the new Firefox? (It's recent update disabled several scripts so I decided to stay on the old 56.0.2 vrelease).
Yes, I suspect this is the new Firefox version as well. Unfortunately in the long term there will be no getting around WebExtensions and their API's and I hope the scripts are updated in the future.
avatar
aufisch: As my game library starts to approach a ridiculous level I feel that the game library (the individual one with the purchased games) needs some improvement.

1) Better sorting; I would love to sort by [...] release-date (the same, sometimes I feel like playing a classic and sometimes I just can't bear the stone age graphics).
Strange that nobody else has pointed this out in here so far (that I've noticed): there are options to "Sort by:" "Oldest first" and "Newest first". They use the release dates GOG has listed in their database (which are sometimes erroneous, and are often inconsistent, but are for the most part close enough).
Post edited January 05, 2018 by HunchBluntley
avatar
HunchBluntley: Strange that nobody else has pointed this out in here so far (that I've noticed): there are options to "Sort by:" "Oldest first" and "Newest first". They use the release dates GOG has listed in their database (which are sometimes erroneous, and are often inconsistent, but are for the most part close enough).
Yes, you are correct. My initial post was not clear in that regard as I would have liked to sort within for example RTS games for old respectively new games.

I have since installed some wonderful scripts and sorting is now improved quite a bit, so I am fine anyway. Thanks for pointing it out though.