It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
Sarafan: Mature games sale might not be the best idea IMHO, but I concur when it comes to Hatred release.
avatar
GamezRanker: Eh, i'd say it'd likely be no worse than some of the more stinkerific sale/event ideas GOG has had.
I think we need to have another witcher sale. I don't think we've had enouhg.
low rated
avatar
kohlrak: I think we need to have another witcher sale. I don't think we've had enouhg.
But doesn't everyone in the known Galaxy(tm) have a copy of all three games by now?
(also a musing/sidenote: I find it interesting GOG didn't have an age gate back when it added it's parent company's games)
Post edited July 20, 2021 by GamezRanker
low rated
avatar
Sarafan: As for the mature content warning, it's a standard in digital distribution stores, so it was a matter of time until it was implemented here.
Interesting. I thought GOG had made their name precisely by being different and going against the flow, providing an alternative to certain industry 'standards', rather than simply copying others?
Post edited July 20, 2021 by Time4Tea
avatar
Time4Tea: I thought GOG had made their name precisely by going against the flow and providing an alternative to certain industry 'standards', rather than simply copying others?
This doesn't mean GOG has to go against industry standards in every single case. It's still going against the flow given the lack of DRM. I don't know what are the exact reasons of this warning sign implementation. I suspect however that some legal reasons might be involved.
avatar
Sarafan: As for the mature content warning, it's a standard in digital distribution stores, so it was a matter of time until it was implemented here.
And not banning AO and/or controversial games solely because they are AO and/or controversial is also an industry standard.

So are we going to get that benefit too, along with these new needless annoyance screens?

Or, alternatively, is GOG going to give us these needless annoyance screens but yet still not reverse their undeclared policy to ban AO and/or controversial games?

GOG really should provide full transparency about this matter, for once, finally (although I doubt that would happen, as historically, they've been extremely non-transparent, including directly as it relates to this matter of why they have, up until now, banned most AO/controversial games from being allowed onto the GOG store).
Post edited July 20, 2021 by Ancient-Red-Dragon
low rated
avatar
GamezRanker: Eh, i'd say it'd likely be no worse than some of the more stinkerific sale/event ideas GOG has had.
avatar
kohlrak: I think we need to have another witcher sale. I don't think we've had enouhg.
witcher 1 repixelled edition
avatar
Ancient-Red-Dragon: And not banning AO and/or controversial games solely because they are AO and/or controversial is also an industry standard.
As I said, in my opinion Hatred and Agony should arrive here. Succubus won't be a great game (those who already played it agree on this), so this potentially opens the possibility of publishing other similar in quality games here. This includes some of the AO games. I don't want GOG to become a dumpster bin in the process however.

avatar
Ancient-Red-Dragon: GOG really should provide full transparency about this matter, for once, finally (although I doubt that would happen, as historically, they've been extremely non-transparent, including directly as it relates to this matter of why they have, up until now, banned most AO/controversial games from being allowed onto the GOG store).
I don't think it's possible to be completely transparent in this case. Steam for example declared some time ago that it's removing the curation process from its store (except for obvious trolling). From time to time we can hear about a game being removed from the store for not entirely specified reasons. It's a lack of consistency despite the officially declared policy. Even if GOG declared official rules, there still would be doubt whether the game should or shouldn't be released here. There's no possible way to ensure full transparency in this case. I presume the developers receive some feedback why their game is refused to be published on GOG.
Post edited July 20, 2021 by Sarafan
low rated
avatar
Sarafan: I don't want GOG to become a dumpster bin in the process however.
I keep seeing people saying similar, and I ask: what's the problem with (some) more games? It's not like everyone has to buy them.
(yeah, way more games would be hard to sort through....but a bit more wouldn't hurt much)
(sidenote: GOG needs better ways to filter out games when searching through the catalog, for people who desire such things)
Post edited July 20, 2021 by GamezRanker
avatar
GamezRanker: I keep seeing people saying similar, and I ask: what's the problem with (some) more games? It's not like everyone has to buy them.
It's probably because people see what's going on on Steam. Try to find a really valuable indie game in the masses of games that are released there every day. It's easy if a game gains popularity for some reasons, but before that, it's just impossible. I don't want a situation in which good games vanish in the crowd.
low rated
avatar
Sarafan: It's probably because people see what's going on on Steam. Try to find a really valuable indie game in the masses of games that are released there every day. It's easy if a game gains popularity for some reasons, but before that, it's just impossible. I don't want a situation in which good games vanish in the crowd.
The amount of games Steam has, though, is much higher than the amount on GOG....I think we've a long ways to go before we need to worry about such things.
avatar
Themken: Uhmm, I see no such warning. Are people in certain areas exempt or people using certain browsers?
avatar
kohlrak: Try this link to be sure.
Thanks, now I received the warning. I tried a lot of games but not Bunnyhop.
avatar
SmollestLight: Yes, the content warning is indeed a new feature :)
What's the purpose then of the Birthday date on our accounts?
/account/settings/personal
low rated
avatar
SmollestLight: Yes, the content warning is indeed a new feature :)
avatar
cryware: What's the purpose then of the Birthday date on our accounts?
/account/settings/personal
Do you mean you actually put in accurate information? That’s mad. Don’t give any data at all out on the internet unless your legally forced to. Am happy to provide a year if need be, but not full DOB, it’s actually illegal in Germany to request full DOB. This information should be restricted, I can’t believe banks and other firms are throwing this information around like it doesn’t matter, I already raised it with my bank that I need to send this via the internet each login, they don’t care. Data protection and privacy is long since out of the window.
avatar
Time4Tea: This is an idiotic feature. We should be able to flag once, for our user account, what age we are, not have to do it every time we try to view the game page for a game with mature content.

Trust GOG to practically never introduce a new feature on the site, then when they do, of course it is an annoying and unnecessary one.
Of course then the onus would be on them to process all the legal documentation while following exact procedure to make sure it all gets securely transmitted.
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: ... it’s actually illegal in Germany to request full DOB.
Sorry to disappoint you, it's not. Only what you can do with the information is heavily restricted by GDPR (to which a lot of the sometimes rather strict German rules contributed).

GOG is pretty much on the safe side, because they don't ask your full name. Only the combination of full name and DOB makes people identifiable (somewhat). In my case the full name would be more critical, since afaik I'm the only person in the world with that exact name, while countless people share my birthday.