Honestly, this is just a pretty extreme example of something I've seen happen across the world in the last 5 or 6 years. I don't think that there are more toxic people than there were but they have all got a lot louder. There are a few events I can think of but won't name directly due to the rules. :P

That is a lie aside from afew posters most here has been civil and not hateful

When members of one religious group are arrested and harassed for practicing their faith and others aren't, that is very much a religious issue, wouldn't you say? Again, the pastors were politically, forcefully and disproportionately prosecuted, whereas the mosques and pro-Palestine protesters got off scott-free. Do you really not see the problem, let alone the gross double standards here? No one is claiming otherwise. My point remains made by virtue of the very lack of provision for religious discrimination. Do pardon my French, and please don't take this as directed at you personally, but that's bovine manure. It's sophisticating around the issue to skirt the central point, much like teacher who was also fired for "gross misconduct". Whereas, if you show a picture of a certain prophet, the school will fall over itself to apologize and happily throw the blasphemer to the [url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/03/29/fear-will-murdered-batley-teacher-tells-father-amid-worries/]wolves.
(And yes, the three matters are entirely unrelated. I mean only to illustrate that "gross misconduct" has nothing to do with it). That's not how a non-oppressive society works. You don't need "courts" to determine if a Christian chaplain delivering a sermon about the Christian viewpoint on identity questions qualifies as extremism. Forgive me, but it feels like you're caught up in legalese or overlooking the point. As evidenced by the search results I sent you, the ACLU is waging targeted lawfare that doesn't care about precedents, hunting for technicalities and amenable judges and returning to the fray whenever they fail to do so. Yes, looking at events throughout the West and seeing the pattern. The double standards on hate crimes may be glossed over or outright denied by academia and secular observers, but are no less evident for it. Once again, because any vandalized mosque or synagogue immediately leads to thorough investigations, condemnation and contrition, with full mobilization of resources, self-flagellation of heads of state and stern, serious looks of TV anchors as they ominously describe the vile crimes that are oh-so inconceivable in the 21st century. Whereas the victims of anti-Christian attacks are lucky if the perpetrators are ever caught, let alone properly convicted.

Oh, and I forgot to include the source for the said "polite persecution" in my previous post. [url=Here]https://acninternational.org/religiousfreedomreport/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Executive-Summary-2021-EN-single-pages-small.pdf[/url] you go (page 38). Indeed. But only if crosses are involved. Stars and crescents earn the "hate crime" badge by default, often a priori.

You consider unabashed bigotry to be civil? That's pretty telling.

Those are all on the first fucking page. And then there's this pearnon character who's trying to say being against bigotry is bigotry (which is a tactic of the extreme right wing bigots)... So, who's lying? Is it a lie because you're incapable of understanding how this could even be bigotry or related to pro bigotry stances?

The fact that this garbage fire thread exists is why pride is still needed. And yet the person who originally posted this garbage tried to paint it as "having politics shoved in their face" (they even edited their message, so who knows how bad it was initially). It has nothing to do with politics, you know it, I know it, they know it. The whole thing is a dog whistle.

This is not the first time I've seen this kind of garbage on here, and up until now I've said nothing. But now I am, and I think the mods ARE NOT doing their jobs if they're not knocking garbage like this out early on.

Actualy it is poltical as a side affect of people who made LGBTQ+ matters political for a long time and what I was talking about most of what was talking about in this thread was not bigotery .. up till like 2 or so pages back.. most was talking about the distaste of corptitizeding pride month and people who hate the fact the corptized fact is mostly a ''hey these folks or those they support we can get extra money this month and act like we truly care when we don't factor'' among other things

Also there is being against bigtory and then their is being intolerant and hateful to those who could get swayed to not be bigoted .. Which is sorta bigoted in itself on the later because its mindlessly hating the otherrather then trying to prove them wrong and change them for the better..

Also it was not the op who edited it but a mod atleast at first .. so it wasn't the op thus thats factual incorret to say the op themselves did the edit at first unsure if the op edited after a mod had though ..

Dude, get a thesaurus or something!

The guy might be a bigot, not sure from his post but come on, you are baiting people into such a discussion here.

Oh and odds are I will step away now as I don't feel like you or me will see eye to eye here and I don't want to keep this thread alive anymore myself as this thread had went away from civil discourse at a piont earler and it has yet to get back on track as a whole it seems

We apparently live in a society where "Kill members of X group" isn't an extremist stance.

I know what you mean. The cheek of calling this forum toxic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19gCdVJz3RE

(◔_◔)

Hi, this is pearnon. Nice to meet you.

It would appear that, in your "bigotry bigotry bigotry bigots bigotry bigotry garbage garbage garbage garbage" tirade, you completely missed the point while simultaneously making it for me. So thanks, I guess.

Not per se. "kill terrorists" is the theme of many video games but nobody argues that Medal of Honor or Call of Duty are poltically extremist games, right?