No, I'll try tomorrow, thank you.

I liked Bulletstorm a good bit iirc. I didn't like the "attitude" it had much, but the gameplay and visuals were quite good I think. I played the original version on Origin, but now there's a "remaster" on Steam that I can't speak to the quality of. Very worth it for that price. I got it for $10 I think and it was well worth that. I agree with falster above that I wouldn't have bought it for $60 day one just for singleplayer, but at $20 or less I think it's quite solid. It's much better than the campaigns for stuff like Battlefront or Call of Duty.

I would point out that like Doom 2016 it seems super fast-paced to me for using analog stick aiming, but since no one on console really complains I guess it's fine. I don't know how they do it though! Haha.

Yup, TF2's campaign was quite good, if a little on the short side. Good level variety and interesting new mechanics introduced from level to level. You do eventually feel like a badass pilot, though it is regrettable that there isn't more pilot v pilot action. Sadly, I wouldn't recommend anyone pay $60 to experience it, but for $15 or less? Yes. I wonder if a case can't be made about separating the single-player content from the multi-player one, and marketing them at different price points.

Yes, thank you, it worked like a charm! ;)
+1 to you

Lots of people buy for one or the other alone at the full $60 price, so I doubt that seems like a good idea to the publishers. I know I bought shooters like Medal of Honor and Call of Duty back in the day at full price just for singleplayer (though I don't anymore).

No problem, have fun!

1. I play it on 360 and it seems nice(story and gameplay/visuals/etc)....didn't know there's a remaster though(likely to sell it on other systems to avoid them giving a free backwards compatible patch for new systems).

2. Some games are fast but you learn to twitch those sticks quickly in such cases.