It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
It looks like the spammers have discovered GOG.

Several recent games have had spam posted to the game contents, mostly by "cinday". Can we get these comments removed, and/or GOG set up some sort of moderation mechanism? Both comments have been heavily marked by readers as unhelpful - GOG might hide any comment with over 12 comments of which over 2/3 are unhelpful (for example).

As it is, both comments were made soon after the games were released and so are listed near the top of the game comments.
Attachments:
gogspam.jpg (30 Kb)
Try a game released earlier and click on the lowest rated comments. There are spams older than 3 years.
Post edited August 23, 2013 by Mivas
GOG doesn't care enough to even make a captcha for reviews written by newly created accounts.
avatar
keeveek: GOG doesn't care enough to even make a captcha for reviews written by newly created accounts.
i always found captcha not a really good solution -> too much words scanned are totaly unreadable..... >.>

if they really want use this, they should only use a combinaison of numbers & letters , it's less annoying.

but , i seriously doubt they really care to put this in place.
avatar
keeveek: GOG doesn't care enough to even make a captcha for reviews written by newly created accounts.
I am sure thast you have to pay to use that system. GOG just needs to quickly check any reviews heavily downrepped and remove those that are truly spam or junk.
avatar
DyNaer: i always found captcha not a really good solution -> too much words scanned are totaly unreadable..... >.>
What I meants was pretty much users with Rep below 10 should put a captcha to submit a review. That would stop most of the spambots and wouldn't annoy genuine users.
avatar
DyNaer: i always found captcha not a really good solution -> too much words scanned are totaly unreadable..... >.>
Uh, what?
You do know that captcha isn't a specific system, right? reCAPTCHA is one implementation, and that might be the one you're thinking of. I must say, though, that it is one of the better ones I have stumbled upon (several others being much too easy for a computer to pass).
Post edited August 23, 2013 by Maighstir
Or they could run all reviews through akismet.
avatar
DyNaer: i always found captcha not a really good solution -> too much words scanned are totaly unreadable..... >.>
avatar
Maighstir: Uh, what?
You do know that captcha isn't a specific system, right? reCAPTCHA is one implementation, and that might be the one you're thinking of. I must say, though, that it is one of the better ones I have stumbled upon (several others being much easy for a computer to pass).
doesn't change anything, both could have unreadable word / worse pirctures....

if it's a countermesure for bots , it can be very annoying for a real person .... i was faced both , so.....

the combinaison of numbers & letters is way more readable (at least for me)
Post edited August 23, 2013 by DyNaer
avatar
DyNaer: doesn't change anything, both could have unreadable word / worse pirctures....
For reCaptcha, the words that seem scanned (or currently street numbers) are actually scanned words (or I guess google street view photos). You can type anything in that half of the captcha, it will be accepted as correct, though the other half must be entered correctly.
avatar
DyNaer: doesn't change anything, both could have unreadable word / worse pirctures....
avatar
JMich: For reCaptcha, the words that seem scanned (or currently street numbers) are actually scanned words (or I guess google street view photos). You can type anything in that half of the captcha, it will be accepted as correct, though the other half must be entered correctly.
ah , didn't know that, thanks for the tip !
avatar
DyNaer: could have unreadable word / worse pirctures....
Which is why the "rotating arrow" button to get a new image exists, another user might have an easier time with that word (it'll be distorted differently another time).
avatar
JMich: For reCaptcha, the words that seem scanned (or currently street numbers) are actually scanned words (or I guess google street view photos). You can type anything in that half of the captcha, it will be accepted as correct, though the other half must be entered correctly.
Isn't that the one that uses the info to help transcribe hard-to-read words in books digitally? I remember reading something in Cracked about it...
Post edited August 23, 2013 by Shaolin_sKunk
avatar
JMich: For reCaptcha, the words that seem scanned (or currently street numbers) are actually scanned words (or I guess google street view photos). You can type anything in that half of the captcha, it will be accepted as correct, though the other half must be entered correctly.
avatar
Shaolin_sKunk: Isn't that the one that uses the info to help transcribe hard-to-read words in books digitally? I remember reading something in Cracked about it...
I wonder, how much Google is making off each correctly recognized scan/photo in captcha? And, does that also mean that they trace your every comment and download by matching IPs between a Google account and captchas?
avatar
Shaolin_sKunk: Isn't that the one that uses the info to help transcribe hard-to-read words in books digitally? I remember reading something in Cracked about it...
Yes. ReCaptcha is google's captcha system, that it used for Project Gutenberg (I think). Unfortunately, they currently skipped the book part and are doing street numbers, thus I no longer bother giving correct answers to that part.