It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
To address the banning, which is what a lot of people want to focus on, the mod was uploaded by a sock puppet account (i.e. a newly made account by someone who already has an account on the site) and uploaded under the name "Mike Hawk". It was very clearly done deliberately to be a troll mod. The fact the user needed to make a sock puppet like a coward to upload the mod showed their intent to troll and that they knew it would not be allowed. Had they not been a coward and had they used their main account instead, we would have simply removed the mod and told them that we did not want to host it, only banning them if they reuploaded it again after being fairly warned. The creation of the sock puppet removed any doubt and made it a very easy decision for us. Both the sock puppet account and the user's main account have been banned.

In regards to the replacement of Pride flags in this game, or any game, our policy is thus: we are for inclusivity, we are for diversity. If we think someone is uploading a mod on our site with the intent to deliberately be against inclusivity and/or diversity then we will take action against it. The same goes for people attempting to troll other users with mods deliberately to cause a rise. For our part, we will endeavour to do a better job of moderating our website to this ethos ourselves.

We aren't the authority on what users can and cannot mod. Us removing a mod only means it cannot be found at Nexus Mods, nothing more, nothing less. We also note that we are not the only site that has removed this mod from their platform. As a private business, we have a right to choose what content we do and do not want to host on our platform. Respect this right the same way you want respect for your rights.
https://archive.ph/cJmT7

Except they aren't respecting the rights of people who have helped make Mr Scotts business a lot of money in recent years,going by their accounts.
As a business their job is to host the damn mods instead of grandstanding unless they were somehow being coerced into this or blackmailed.
Somehow people on the internet have got this retarded american idea that somehow businesses get to do what they want is ridiculous.Twitch is another example of this way of working except they aren't UK businesses unlike nexusmods.

The BBC has an article now and modDB has jumped on the bandwagon.
He said the upload was removed and its creator was banned from Nexus Mods for violating the company's policies.
These say content which could be considered provocative, discriminatory or abusive towards "any real-world individual or group" may be moderated.
"In regards to the replacement of Pride flags in this game, or any game, our policy is thus: we are for inclusivity, we are for diversity," Mr Scott added.

ModDB, another popular modding site, also deleted similar uploads to its site this week.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-62605749

Their actions aren't supported by there terms either.
high rated
Are you suggesting that Nexus Mods be forced to host a mod they don't want to? If you're trying some kind of bizarre "freedom of speech" angle, it's not working. The mod creator is free to host the mod themselves, so this isn't censorship. This is just Nexus exercising their own freedom.

As they themselves say, they are not the authority on what users can and cannot mod. Just because it's not available on Nexus doesn't mean the mod maker can't upload it somewhere else.
Post edited August 20, 2022 by my name is grompy catte
high rated
avatar
my name is grompy catte: The mod creator is free to host the mod themselves, so this isn't censorship. This is just Nexus exercising their own freedom.
No, you see, freedom is being allowed to kick other people and then shoot them if they resist, and then wave a flag thus declaring yourself the victor.
avatar
my name is grompy catte: The mod creator is free to host the mod themselves, so this isn't censorship. This is just Nexus exercising their own freedom.
avatar
Warloch_Ahead: No, you see, freedom is being allowed to kick other people and then shoot them if they resist, and then wave a flag thus declaring yourself the victor.
I see... my mistake.
avatar
my name is grompy catte: Are you suggesting that Nexus Mods be forced to host a mod they don't want to? If you're trying some kind of bizarre "freedom of speech" angle, it's not working.
I think the OP's point is that a company like Nexus Mods should simply host mods and abide by its own stated rules, though the sentence about American ideas and businesses doing what they want is confusing to me.

Claiming that person is acting in a ridiculous, hypocritical, or inconsistent manner is not equivalent to stating that he should not be allowed to act in such a manner.

If I'm understanding this correctly, the mod in question harms no one, and in fact a person would have to go out of his way to even claim offense. It offers what all mods are supposed to offer: freedom of choice.

A mod that removes a particular flag or ideological symbol is no different than a mod which adds such things, or in fact any mod at all. A mod is a luxury, and the ability to download a mod is entirely voluntary. As such, regarding the concepts of diversity and inclusion the action of Nexus Mods has no effect except that of reducing them.

In no way can one pretend that a person (or company) taking a position against the addition or presence of a thing he/it finds offensive is equivalent to taking a position against the absence of a thing that he/it finds unoffensive. The former is the result of freedom and understandable; the latter is the result of freedom and absurd.
You know what, nevermind, I'd rather not partake in this thread any more than I have to.
Post edited August 20, 2022 by Warloch_Ahead
avatar
§pec†re:
The creation of the alt account should not have affected their decision at all. banning the user on one offence (i'm assuming?) is probably overboard.

Keyword deliberately. If they start removing stuff that can somehow be contrived as offensive, that would be a major problem.

It's certainly a PR move. Normally people would just ignore something like that.

Companies do get to do what they want. I'm not familiar with twitch at all, but from what little I heard, they compel crime? Or am I thinking of something completely different? I'm probably thinking of something completely different.
avatar
Warloch_Ahead: No, you see, freedom is being allowed to kick other people and then shoot them if they resist, and then wave a flag thus declaring yourself the victor.
Who are you quoting, or is this your personal opinion?
avatar
Warloch_Ahead: Considering the thread is just whining about politics the OP doesn't like, it already breaks the forum rules here anyway. And since a private company can do as it pleases so long as it's not breaking any laws, Nexus can moderate its content in whatever way it wants and users who don't like that can suspend all activity on that service. Funny how a free market works.
This thread is not about politics?
Post edited August 20, 2022 by FrostburnPhoenix
avatar
my name is grompy catte: Are you suggesting that Nexus Mods be forced to host a mod they don't want to?.
Indeed they should.

There shouldn't be such a thing as "Nexus Mods not wanting to," unless the mod is illegal, which this one is not.

Other than mods being illegal, the mod hosting platforms should have no opinion on the mods and they certainly should not be censoring mods for political and/or ideological reasons, which this recent debacle is a definite example of.

And censorship by biased mod platforms as cited in the OP also shows a huge flaw with a sentiment that is often expressed on this very board, where GOG users say things like "Steam Workshop is horrible and mod creators need to host their mods on Nexus and ModDB instead."

But Nexus' and ModDB's tyrannical censorship actions prove that they are horrible platforms too that are just as bad, if not worse, than Steam Workshop.
high rated
I hated Nexus mods ever since they required you to make a email account to download mods of over 100MB back in 2007.

At least moddb.com does not ask you to make a account to download mods from them.

Screw any web site that requires you to make a account to download mods or a client, this includes Steam's Steam Workshop.

Modding should never, ever be locked behind a email account.
I don't see how replacing few flags with American flags in a video game would harm anyone. I mean it could be a Russian flag, or a banner of any company or a trade mark. There must be a plenty of such mods on Nexus Mods, right? So this is a big shame on Nexus Mods owners for such a high level of lies.
avatar
my name is grompy catte: The mod creator is free to host the mod themselves, so this isn't censorship. This is just Nexus exercising their own freedom.
avatar
Warloch_Ahead: No, you see, freedom is being allowed to kick other people and then shoot them if they resist, and then wave a flag thus declaring yourself the victor.
https://xkcd.com/1357/
If this is another, then what was the first reason?

Anyway, it's true they have the right to remove any mod they don't like. What they did wrong was posture about it, because we all know that's pure bs. Such a bad move on their part!

Edit:

This is taken from their main page:
Welcome to Nexus Mods
We host 394,759 files for 1,821 games from 155,629 authors serving 34,822,986 members with 6,185,118,942 downloads to date. We've donated $2,600,517 to our mod authors through Donation Points. If you can mod it, we'll host it.
Post edited August 20, 2022 by honglath
high rated
avatar
Ancient-Red-Dragon: Indeed they should.

There shouldn't be such a thing as "Nexus Mods not wanting to," unless the mod is illegal, which this one is not.

Other than mods being illegal, the mod hosting platforms should have no opinion on the mods and they certainly should not be censoring mods for political and/or ideological reasons, which this recent debacle is a definite example of.

And censorship by biased mod platforms as cited in the OP also shows a huge flaw with a sentiment that is often expressed on this very board, where GOG users say things like "Steam Workshop is horrible and mod creators need to host their mods on Nexus and ModDB instead."

But Nexus' and ModDB's tyrannical censorship actions prove that they are horrible platforms too that are just as bad, if not worse, than Steam Workshop.
This is the equivalent of saying that you allow people to put some signs in your yard. Then someone puts a sign in your yard saying the Nazis were right. The implication is already that you agree with it because you allow the sign in your yard. Should you, the owner of said yard be forced to allow signs that diametrically oppose what you believe in, and by association mean that you AGREE with that? All because you have agreed that some people are allowed to post signs on your lawn? Or do you, as a private citizen have the right to say "That sign goes too far, and I won't have it on my property." I believe you do in most countries. Further, the mod hosting agreement states they will remove mods they find disagreeable. So if you don't like the terms of service, then move on. Find someone who will allow your bullshit, or who will stand up for your right to post whatever you like wherever you like. Because that's not actually a right, and never has been.
Someone should make a mod replacing LGTV4k flags with Ukraine flags and see if mods will get a seizure.
avatar
my name is grompy catte: Are you suggesting that Nexus Mods be forced to host a mod they don't want to?.
avatar
Ancient-Red-Dragon: Indeed they should.

There shouldn't be such a thing as "Nexus Mods not wanting to," unless the mod is illegal, which this one is not.

Other than mods being illegal, the mod hosting platforms should have no opinion on the mods
Why shouldn't they be able to have an opinion?
avatar
AWG43: So this is a big shame on Nexus Mods owners for such a high level of lies.
What lies?
Post edited August 20, 2022 by my name is grompy catte