Hurricane0440: That's just me though. What about you all? Let me know.
AB2012: It's always been a mix:-
Digital:- + More convenient, take up less space
+ No "NoCD's" patches need applying
+ You can always burn offline installers to optical media anyway if you wanted a DVD-R / BD-R version.
Discs:- + Immune to GOG's unfortunate habit of arbitrarily deleting DOS game's original.exe's if they pre-package a game with ScummVM which is the last thing "game preservation" is about.
+ Immune to unwanted post-purchase content changes by publishers such as forced removal of expired soundtracks.
+ They'll always give you a "clean base" to work from when applying potential future tweaks / mods without them clashing with whatever the store pre-modded them with. No unwanted middle-man "pre-tweaks" like GOG's recent
DAO mess.
+ You can usually rip them to an .iso / zip up the game folder if you wanted a "digital" version.
+ You can always find original versions on Ebay years / decades later without fear of the publisher forcibly removing them from digital stores and trying to erase them from history due to remakeitus.
+ You get to enjoy the thousands of classic games which aren't (and possibly never will be) available "digitally" like No One Lives Forever, Dune, Lemmings, Freelancer, Prey (2006), etc.
Pretty much the same for me.
I've never been a fan of "stuff", in an ideal world where everything is available without strings attached I'd say digital 100%, but these are all more than valid points you just can't ignore.