It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
^ A centipede for two reasons. 1) They eat spiders. 2) I think riding a giant centipede thru town would be cooler than riding a beetle.
< About damn time the sun came out!
v Why do people insist on playing bass so loud? It hurts my ears, even though the main street they are on is 2 blocks away.

Edit: Ninja'd again!

^ Pupusas! Hopefully 1 of the 2 restaurants in the area survived the quarantine period.
Post edited May 23, 2020 by ZyloxDragon
^ When the music sucks, you have to at least feel the bass's vibrations I guess. Or maybe they think it has to sound that way because their expensive but shitty headphones sound like that?
< I use too much salt when I cook. Salt is food's bass, right?
v No sugar or no salt for one week?

Edit: Sound is to everybody's personal taste. My comment is not meant to attack any person who prefers a loud bass in any way.
Post edited May 23, 2020 by MightyFloTheKing
^ No sugar would do me some good.
< Yet I'll never let good food be thrown out, which is why I saved a clean but open tray of cookies this morning.
v Is surely disgusted by the extremes I'll go to maintain my virtue.
> Rest assured, any mold, rot, or un-edible grains or fluids that stick to food still very much ruins it for me.
^ I am definitely not disgusted by anybody maintaining their virtue, no matter what that entails.

> I'd do much the same really. As long as the food is still edible, you know the old adage: Over the teeth and through the gums, watch out stomach, 'cause here it comes!

v Luckily I have an iron stomach, and no allergies. What about you?
^ I have been told "you have a cast iron stomach."
< When it comes to disgusting fare, "You shall not pass!"
v If it's hot going in it's "___ _____ ___"?
^ Hot coming out!
< Trying to think of a way to seg-way that into the commercial where a little boy is freaked out by all the teen girls' singing belly-buttons.
v Doesn't believe that exists.
^ This sounds like a Family Guy episode where Stewie finds out that he doesn't have a navel. So his hatred for his mother and women in general is the result of the psychotrauma that he suffered through the absence of a mother in his development in a cold empty laboratory's incubator... And Stewie realizes this through watching said commercial.
< I want a South Park episode where Cartman thinks he has no navel (because he can't find it because he's fat.) He then breaks into Area 51 to find the clone lab. And he finds it, filled with 1000s of Kennys...
v Simpsons or Family Guy or South Park or something else?
^ South Park was mostly tolerable and sometimes King of the Hill scored, but I really enjoyed The Venture Bros.
< I prefer Science Fiction
v What video would you binge watch all day or night?
low rated
^ (either that one or "Live to Win" from that one WOW South Park episode...essentially a good song/music video I can loop for awhile)

< Now I gotta eat soon...maybe i'll have a burger.
v Is Kahuna Burger a tasty burger?
^ That's that Hawaiian burger joint? I hear they got some tasty burgers... ain't never had one myself.
< My tummy says no to burgers at this time.
v Do you feel game developers spend too much time on graphics rather than gameplay?
low rated
^ I think they do a bit, but then I also like(skippable) cutscenes and similar eye candy, so i'm ok with it to a degree(as long as I can run it and as long as the devs didn't dacrifice other aspects like story and such)
< Now I am gonna go play some games....mostly sequels I never beat to games I beat already.
v What are you gonna play next?
Post edited May 25, 2020 by GameRager
^ Hulk: Ultimate Destruction
< Building the Lego T-rex Rampage has been a doozy, but they really slipped the banana by putting a frog in the belly when it should obviously be a goat!
v I recently had an amusing exchange at The Editing Room with an evolution denial-ist, should I share my deleted comments here with descriptions of his part?
low rated
^ You can if you want(i'd like to hear it), but I am guessing I know what'll it'll boil down to(earth a few thousand years old, fossils are fakes, etc). :)
< Will wait for that info dump as I eat some burgers(actual burgers this time, not virtual ones like earlier)
v Were you an 80's kid or a 90's kid?(This can be in actuality[as per your birth year] or at heart[which decade you feel you liked best])
^ I was born in late '89 and enjoyed much of what the 90's offered, so I'm a 90's kid.
< He comments to a years-old post under the Jurassic World parody-script insisting that anybody who pushes feathered dinosaurs is a liar.

"[link to wikipedia]... Some bones are surrounded by feather imprints because they died in soft sand. I don't have any idea how you're so confident that all dinosaurs were scaled or why you take into account JP's writing only when the flaws of it suit you but not the part where Alan Grant very truthfully points out the obvious bird-like posture of therapods; but fossil records and living genomes are infinitely more reliable than even the most educated guess-work of story-tellers. A great thing about DNA is, segments never leave the sequence, they can only be added or deactivated. This is why [link to an article about toothy chickens]...
I think denial of self-upgrading organic compounds and all the forensic evidence of it is to deny the real Intelligent Design."

He stubbornly equates my conclusion to trust in deceiving experts, concludes "rock formations" surround the fossils and spews insults that equate me to a science-denier.

" 'I don't have any idea how you're so confident that all dinosaurs were scaled.'
Fossils (GOD's fossils) say feathers, ill-informed assumptions say scales; oh who will I take seriously?"

He claims, I'm not kidding, that "Taxonomy is as scientific as anything" and that says dinosaurs are reptiles, therefore scales and you just can't have feathers growing out of them.

"Taxonomy is a system of cataloging and founded purely on, as you put it, "evolutionists saying" which is far less scientific than the evidence itself. Apart of their method of classification is that all life continues the legacy of their ancestors, which means all vertebrates are fish, all land-vertebrates are amphibians, and so on. This is supported by the dormant DNA I mentioned; which is good news for prospects of a real Jurassic Park: reactivate dormant dino-DNA in birds to make them bigger and toothier. Theoretically, we could eventually breed a completely accurate replica of any extinct species that has a living descendant (sorry armored fish and suropods) but they'll be full of deactivated modern genes.

I really don't care what even experts say, anyone honest enough to closely inspect the patterns around those fossils is going to say they're feathers."
v I might keep the Avengers Headquarters, but only the garage and lab; above the lab was a thoroughly unimpressive rec room that I've already disassembled.
Post edited May 25, 2020 by MichaelD.965
^ Would you care to post that in the form of a question?
< actually knows quite a bit about paleontology
v Did you know the Velociraptors as depicted in the Jurassic Park series of movies are much larger than they were actually, which was approximately the size of a domestic chicken.