Nirth: What does that mean then? I know the King is an important symbol for your country and that he's rich but does he really have (or want?) political power?
He is generally loved and respected by (most) Thais, also the reds. That's where his power comes from. The army would most probably not oppose him, ever.
Too bad he is kinda old, and his only son is not as much liked (he is called a playboy-prince). The king has a daughter though who is well liked, but she is not becoming a king either for obvious reasons.
I just read yesterday that the prince has "fled"(??????) to some luxury hotel in Britain. Probably just wants a vacation from the ruckus in his homeland.
jonwil: If the majority of the people of Thailand supported the things Thaksin was doing then shouldn't everyone in Thailand respect the democratic process?
I guess they should, but the yellow protesters don't want democratic elections because they know already they will lose every time, due to being in the minority (there are much more rural poor people, than rich or middle-class people living in the big cities). The yellows openly seem to think that the poor rural people are not fit to vote.
I've seen some suggestions by the yellows that there should be some other political system in Thailand instead of democratic elections. Like some kind of "public servant government" where the people of Thailand don't get to choose the people running the country. It should be the better people in Bangkok who run the country by default, I guess.